205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -117.51%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.22%
Negative yoy D&A while QRVO is 1008.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
66.40%
Well above QRVO's 132.01% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-14.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -16.50%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1.48%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -113.42%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
269.39%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -114.28%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-73.53%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with QRVO at -44.91%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
555.56%
AP growth well above QRVO's 129.79%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-89.35%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 300.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2485.71%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -396.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-1.84%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with QRVO at -26.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
20.86%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -37.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-20.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 86.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.54%
We have some liquidation growth while QRVO is negative at -53.10%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
15.71%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -55.21%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-13.60%
We reduce yoy invests while QRVO stands at 53.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.00%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -99.94%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.