PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.72%
Some net income increase while QRVO is negative at -35.72%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-168.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 7.85%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
53.66%
SBC growth well above QRVO's 96.39%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-247.40%
Negative yoy working capital usage while QRVO is 3568.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-190.30%
AR is negative yoy while QRVO is 34.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-105.13%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 113.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
303.45%
A yoy AP increase while QRVO is negative at -45.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-505.75%
Negative yoy usage while QRVO is 149.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-190.91%
Both negative yoy, with QRVO at -31.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-51.48%
Negative yoy CFO while QRVO is 37.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.23%
Some CapEx rise while QRVO is negative at -42.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
68.79%
Purchases well above QRVO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
437.05%
Liquidation growth of 437.05% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
96.79%
Growth well above QRVO's 67.02%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
143.00%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -712.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
0.13%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -36.65%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
204.17%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -40.78%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-235.58%
We cut yoy buybacks while QRVO is 66.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.