PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.15%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 41.27%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.49%
D&A growth well above QRVO's 0.85%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-112.50%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 432.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
13.11%
Less SBC growth vs. QRVO's 37.46%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
67.77%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -2766.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
95.88%
AR growth while QRVO is negative at -487.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-38.46%
Negative yoy inventory while QRVO is 762.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-124.64%
Negative yoy AP while QRVO is 227.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
52.00%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. QRVO's 574.49%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-2750.00%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 114.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of QRVO's 31.12%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-25.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -46.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.83%
Purchases growth of 29.83% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
22.75%
Liquidation growth of 22.75% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1878.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -48.64%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
111.45%
We have mild expansions while QRVO is negative at -276.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while QRVO is negative at -7800.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-72.45%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 8.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-46.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -39.94%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.