205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Net income growth under 50% of QRVO's 173.82%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
6.76%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -1.19%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-550.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 115.99%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.73%
SBC growth while QRVO is negative at -10.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
40.90%
Slight usage while QRVO is negative at -196.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-538.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with QRVO at -424.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
16.95%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. QRVO's 109.35%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
159.68%
AP growth well above QRVO's 45.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Some yoy usage while QRVO is negative at -124.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while QRVO is 886.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -2.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.25%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -8.17%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Negative yoy purchasing while QRVO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-23.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1150.00%
We have some outflow growth while QRVO is negative at -65.31%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-8617.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -16.70%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
64.21%
Debt repayment growth of 64.21% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-23.53%
Negative yoy issuance while QRVO is 16.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.30%
Buyback growth below 50% of QRVO's 54.27%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.