PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with QRVO at -108.45%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.67%
Some D&A expansion while QRVO is negative at -0.61%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while QRVO stands at 344.81%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with QRVO at -38.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.82%
Less working capital growth vs. QRVO's 204.62%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
74.68%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. QRVO's 353.48%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
59.41%
Some inventory rise while QRVO is negative at -303.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-63.51%
Both negative yoy AP, with QRVO at -490.49%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
359.38%
Growth well above QRVO's 63.89%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
61.63%
Some yoy increase while QRVO is negative at -31.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.46%
Some CFO growth while QRVO is negative at -11.24%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while QRVO is 26.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Purchases growth of 23.89% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.87%
We reduce yoy sales while QRVO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-111.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with QRVO at -18.03%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
28.97%
Investing outflow well above QRVO's 27.13%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while QRVO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
4.62%
We slightly raise equity while QRVO is negative at -87.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
41.77%
We have some buyback growth while QRVO is negative at -25.98%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.