205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-70.63%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 2.44%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-1.29%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.25%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-12.20%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.03%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.28%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.79%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is -54.71%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
102.19%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 2.26% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-34.43%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -1.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
26.20%
CapEx growth of 26.20% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
56.46%
Purchases growth of 56.46% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
30.23%
Proceeds growth of 30.23% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-100.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-34.55%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 14.04%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-35.04%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is -3.91%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-63.45%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.