205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is -20.10%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-4.60%
D&A shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-52.94%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
24.14%
SBC growth of 24.14% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-206.15%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Semiconductors median is -40.87%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-131.45%
AR shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-242.50%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-5300.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-479.49%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Semiconductors median is -50.53%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
129.30%
Under 50% of Semiconductors median of 8.87% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-54.34%
Negative CFO growth while Semiconductors median is -16.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
24.39%
CapEx growth of 24.39% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
81.02%
Purchases growth of 81.02% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
105.95%
Proceeds growth of 105.95% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
94.83%
Growth of 94.83% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
184.89%
Investing flow of 184.89% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-38.18%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-0.48%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.