PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 12.35%. Jim Chanos would flag it as a serious shortfall in bottom-line expansion vs. competitors.
1.75%
D&A growth under 50% of Semiconductors median of 0.20%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
103.23%
Deferred tax growth of 103.23% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
5.71%
SBC growth of 5.71% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
132.91%
Working capital of 132.91% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
44.89%
AR growth of 44.89% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
40.21%
Inventory growth of 40.21% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
111.76%
AP growth of 111.76% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
306.80%
Growth of 306.80% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
17.65%
Growth of 17.65% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
64.21%
CFO growth of 64.21% while Semiconductors median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-31.75%
CapEx declines yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-5.50%
We liquidate less yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-5975.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-130.45%
Reduced investing yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
We reduce issuance yoy while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-16.61%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.