205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.90%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
96.36%
Deferred tax growth of 96.36% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
4.55%
SBC growth of 4.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-149.76%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-73.31%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-144.83%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
54.88%
AP growth of 54.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-323.08%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-53.76%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -0.96%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
32.68%
CapEx growth of 32.68% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-1660.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
79.61%
Purchases growth of 79.61% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
60.84%
Proceeds growth of 60.84% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.08%
Investing flow of 127.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-50.00%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
103.94%
Issuance growth of 103.94% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.