PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Net income growth of 17.55% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-0.40%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
11.76%
Deferred tax growth of 11.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
9.52%
SBC growth of 9.52% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
106.69%
Working capital of 106.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
157.85%
AR growth of 157.85% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-6550.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
23.73%
AP growth of 23.73% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
87.54%
Growth of 87.54% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
125.00%
Growth of 125.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
102.12%
CFO growth of 102.12% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
19.25%
CapEx growth of 19.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases growth of 61.46% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
10.50%
Proceeds growth of 10.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-2380.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
73.97%
Investing flow of 73.97% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
33.24%
Debt repayment growth of 33.24% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-40.41%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
46.25%
Buyback growth of 46.25% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.