205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth of 24.76% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-2.80%
D&A shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
56.86%
Deferred tax growth of 56.86% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-16.00%
SBC declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
238.74%
Working capital of 238.74% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
89.81%
AR growth of 89.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
82.81%
Inventory growth of 82.81% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
123.08%
AP growth of 123.08% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
742.31%
Growth of 742.31% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-384.38%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
47.26%
CFO growth of 47.26% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-45.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
45.21%
Acquisition growth of 45.21% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
7.44%
Purchases growth of 7.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
211.18%
Proceeds growth of 211.18% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-45.91%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
54.50%
Investing flow of 54.50% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
We reduce issuance yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.