PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative at -0.16%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
0.47%
D&A growth of 0.47% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
75.00%
Deferred tax growth of 75.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
48.00%
SBC growth of 48.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-572.34%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-95.83%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-219.15%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
120.37%
AP growth of 120.37% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-181.37%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-500.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is -15.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-9.04%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is -1.36%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
65.44%
CapEx growth of 65.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-97.06%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-7.87%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
2.44%
Proceeds growth of 2.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
50.00%
Growth of 50.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
25.17%
Investing flow of 25.17% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
9.62%
Issuance growth of 9.62% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-314.79%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.