205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -3.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
7.42%
D&A growth of 7.42% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
49.29%
Deferred tax growth of 49.29% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
55.88%
SBC growth of 55.88% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-227.14%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-38.62%
AR shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
7.69%
Inventory growth of 7.69% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-670.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-261.98%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-1650.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Technology median is 1.47%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-47.14%
Negative CFO growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-8.71%
CapEx declines yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
6500.00%
Acquisition growth of 6500.00% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-89.63%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-22.87%
We liquidate less yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-566.67%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-970.42%
Reduced investing yoy while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-57.09%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
95.38%
Buyback growth of 95.38% while Technology median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.