205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.82%
Positive revenue growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
177.57%
Positive gross profit growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
251.26%
Positive EBIT growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
251.26%
Positive operating income growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-44.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-60.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-60.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
19.85%
Share count expansion well above ADI's 10.75%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.85%
Diluted share count expanding well above ADI's 10.75%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
58.73%
Dividend growth of 58.73% while ADI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ADI's 26.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
39.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ADI's 26.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
28.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ADI's 20.54%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
179.25%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
179.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 179.25% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
24.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 24.43% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
57.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 37.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
57.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 37.64%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
32.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ADI's 24.50%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-14.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-14.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while ADI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-14.28%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ADI invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.15%
AR growth well above ADI's 5.28%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-9.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.64%
Positive asset growth while ADI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-15.87%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
2.31%
We have some new debt while ADI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.37%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ADI's 1.24%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.