205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.49%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
13.22%
Positive gross profit growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
597.37%
Positive EBIT growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
634.21%
Positive operating income growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
215.38%
Positive net income growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
233.33%
Positive EPS growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
233.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.18%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
3.22%
Dividend growth of 3.22% while ADI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
82.20%
Positive OCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
146.94%
Positive FCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
9.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 131.41%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-11.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while ADI stands at 71.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-40.47%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 127.17%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
6.52%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
43.07%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 43.07% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-45.24%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 182.25%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
51.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 32.52%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
93.58%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.58% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
33.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 33.51% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.52% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.07%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-19.26%
Inventory is declining while ADI stands at 2.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.61%
Positive asset growth while ADI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.34%
Similar to ADI's 1.25%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-0.15%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-4.90%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-31.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.