205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.79%
Positive revenue growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
39.45%
Positive gross profit growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
272.17%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x ADI's 195.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
3330.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ADI's 195.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x ADI's 107.44%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
2000.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x ADI's 100.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1900.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ADI's 100.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.63%
Share reduction while ADI is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.39%
Reduced diluted shares while ADI is at 0.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.80%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
121.91%
OCF growth above 1.5x ADI's 26.85%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
144.71%
FCF growth above 1.5x ADI's 69.74%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
29.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 60.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
128.04%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 3.40%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
53.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
6.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-0.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ADI is at 51.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.92%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-86.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
73.41%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of ADI's 92.46%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
3.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-11.69%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
417.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 417.19% while ADI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
423.04%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to ADI's 399.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
262.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 64.61%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
10.58%
Our AR growth while ADI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.19%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.09%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.66%
75-90% of ADI's 0.74%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.21%
We expand SG&A while ADI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.