PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.45%
Revenue growth under 50% of ADI's 24.91%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.88%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ADI's 19.70%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
20.05%
EBIT growth 50-75% of ADI's 33.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
20.81%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of ADI's 33.59%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
21.69%
Positive net income growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.86%
Positive EPS growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.60%
Share reduction while ADI is at 7.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.69%
Reduced diluted shares while ADI is at 7.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth under 50% of ADI's 10.90%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
87.79%
Positive OCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.52%
Positive FCF growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
61.16%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 82.74%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
38.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ADI's 70.57%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
26.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ADI's 68.53%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
61.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
63.85%
Positive OCF/share growth while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
33.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
137.49%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
87.46%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while ADI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
41.50%
Below 50% of ADI's 239.16%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
10.21%
Below 50% of ADI's 100.13%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
12.58%
Below 50% of ADI's 69.51%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
522.75%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 146.23%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
191.83%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 50.92%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
66.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x ADI's 22.50%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
7.28%
AR growth well above ADI's 9.87%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.99%
Positive asset growth while ADI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.24%
Positive BV/share change while ADI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Our R&D shrinks while ADI invests at 17.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.07%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.