205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 178.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
7.84%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 178.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 190.47%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 190.47%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-34.14%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 351.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.64%
Share change of 0.64% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.64%
Diluted share change of 0.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
8.00%
Dividend growth of 8.00% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 118.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 118.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 118.47%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 121.04% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
291.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 121.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
291.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 121.04%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.