PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.18%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 8.41%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.18%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 8.41%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
6.18%
EBIT growth 50-75% of AMD's 8.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
6.18%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of AMD's 8.41%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
7.37%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 29.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
16.67%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 36.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
16.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 36.36%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 46.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
20.39%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 46.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
20.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 46.69%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
617.50%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 168.30% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
617.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 168.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
617.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 168.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.