PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.25%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.25%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1.25%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.25%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.07%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.45%
Share change of 1.45% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.45%
Diluted share change of 1.45% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 59.80%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 59.80%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
24.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 59.80%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 133.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
206.64%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 133.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
206.64%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 133.74%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.