205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.27%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.27%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-368.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-368.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.71%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.11%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 2.48%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.11%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 2.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 20.46%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
31.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 20.46%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
31.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 20.46%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
317.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
317.31%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.09% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
-46.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-46.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-46.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.