205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.37%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-66.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-101.44%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-101.44%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-63.79%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-65.00%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-65.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.12%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.12%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.02%
Dividend growth of 3.02% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-74.43%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1004.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.33%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 34.89%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
24.33%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 34.89%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
13.75%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 71.25%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
192.70%
Similar net income/share CAGR to AMD's 188.35%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
192.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 188.35%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
-83.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 526.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.60% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.52%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 7.73%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.34%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 0.97%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.80%
Similar to AMD's 1.85%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-3.06%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 2.74%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.