PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.53%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-4.88%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-115.79%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-115.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-163.64%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-220.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-220.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.25%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.25%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-4.40%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-112.40%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 74.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.65%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 49.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
29.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 41.46%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
29.67%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 41.46%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
12.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 17.07% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
92.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 17.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-111.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 67.40%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.31%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.31% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.82%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.34%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.77%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.22%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 5.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
16.84%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.16%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.