PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth similar to AMD's 4.60%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
171.79%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 17.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-1233.33%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 16.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1233.33%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 16.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-700.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-445.24%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-445.24%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 1.96%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 106.91%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
223.77%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 69.56%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
34.49%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 33.52%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 33.52%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
10.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1.26%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-25.93%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-169.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 52.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
31.37%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.45%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.32%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.34%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.16%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 6.38%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.