PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.37%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-66.16%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 21.40%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
12.50%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 136.97%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.50%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 136.97%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.57%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 109.77%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-9.17%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.70%
Share reduction while AMD is at 3.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.70%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
12.88%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AMD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-90.30%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-135.76%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 140.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
38.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 27.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
38.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 27.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
12.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-298.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 126.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-298.66%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 126.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-163.05%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.93%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 7.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.82%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.20%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 1.53%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.63%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
18.67%
Debt growth far above AMD's 10.56%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.20%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 1.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.