PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.77%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
3.40%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
45.05%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.50%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
45.05%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
28.03%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.08%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-5.09%
Share reduction while AMD is at 10.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.09%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 10.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-29.19%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-105.00%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 3570.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1.87%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 127.13%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
44.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 39.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
38.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 15.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
15.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 168.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-921.03%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 123.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-229.33%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 104.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
577.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 577.65% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
527.45%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 527.45% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.20%
AR growth well above AMD's 2.77%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.72%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 6.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.68%
Similar asset growth to AMD's 1.57%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
15.26%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.