PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.12%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 26.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
223.36%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 38.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
31.15%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 215.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.15%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 215.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
24.78%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 524.56%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
37.80%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.80%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
14.90%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.90%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
14.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 5.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-75.13%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
35000.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 247.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
321.90%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 1252.24%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
28.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 55.40%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
17.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 52.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-2.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 29.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 710.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-387.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 477.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-184.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 373.80%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
21.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 21.11% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
1.73%
Equity/share CAGR of 1.73% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
7.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 6.21%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-15.75%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.75%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.02%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.02% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.39%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.12%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.55%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 10.61%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-20.60%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 14.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.73%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 6.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.