PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 11.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 14.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 60.06%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
250.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 60.06%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
147.06%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.23%
EPS growth of 148.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
148.23%
Diluted EPS growth of 148.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-29.30%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-29.30%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.23%
Dividend growth of 53.23% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-97.71%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 0.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-130.90%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 66.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 110.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
41.60%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 32.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 569.63%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 2365.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 634.85%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 158.20% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 139.08% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 9.18%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.84%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 2.84%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-6.19%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 6.39%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 11.86%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 5.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.