205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.34%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 1.86%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
0.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 4.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-9.38%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 17.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-9.38%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 17.23%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-20.83%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 18.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-20.00%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 18.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 19.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.76%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.76%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-3.40%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
131.58%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 86.68%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
319.57%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 8316.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
59.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 74.17%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
38.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 18.18%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
13.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 14.92%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.99%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 300.72%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
5.29%
Below 50% of AMD's 178.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-18.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD is 259.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.02%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 25.91%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.37%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
70.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 70.37% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.63%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.72%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 3.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.85%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.