PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 12.20%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
134.81%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 16.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.59%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 41.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.59%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 41.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
35.09%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 41.75%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
19.32%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 2.92%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 2.15%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-12.55%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
14.29%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
6.22%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
38.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 68.79%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
13.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 28.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-0.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 14.35%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 41.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
258.23%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 495.32%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-12.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 2265.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.65%
Below 50% of AMD's 376.64%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
15.18%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.18% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
-0.88%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 33.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-27.07%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-19.54%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
48.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 48.99% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.13%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-12.16%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.02%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.07%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-18.17%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 5.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.05%
We have some new debt while AMD reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.30%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 5.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.