205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.73%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.42%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
14.88%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 7.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
23.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
23.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
38.27%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.72%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
60.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.13%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
60.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.23%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-10.96%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-10.96%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
22.52%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AMD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
121.15%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
219.05%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
57.39%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 62.27%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
30.73%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 10.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 38.73%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 381.57%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
747.03%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 240.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
18.05%
Below 50% of AMD's 105.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
921.88%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of AMD's 1090.85%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.89%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 58.78%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
77.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 77.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
64.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.10% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
0.36%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
3.67%
AR growth well above AMD's 5.58%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.00%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 0.12%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.34%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 4.92%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.75%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 7.20%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.71%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 18.66%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.28%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 4.83%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.