205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.99%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3232.57%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3232.57%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-8.90%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-10.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-18.38%
Share reduction while AMD is at 1.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
16.37%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 5.97%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-9.44%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
36.22%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 138.75%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
88.24%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 925.38%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 66.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 38.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
53.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 24.87%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 191.98%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
440.05%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 326.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
56.48%
Below 50% of AMD's 201.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
370.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 177.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
70.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 70.39% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
50.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 74.21%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
11.63%
Below 50% of AMD's 70.70%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-29.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
31.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.31% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-15.96%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
3.13%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.95%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 11.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 8.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
23.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.10%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.95%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 42.69%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.