PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.55%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 1.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.09%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.33%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
8.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.53%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.39%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.60%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
28.73%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while AMD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
36.43%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
170.27%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 142.53%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
25.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 60.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 73.94%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32045.29%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 254.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
282.66%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 424.10%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
115.17%
Below 50% of AMD's 480.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
232.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of AMD's 369.85%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.64%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while AMD is at 98.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.50%
Below 50% of AMD's 128.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 32.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-78.93%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
0.83%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 5.61%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-1.58%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 6.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.49%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 6.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.43%
Similar to AMD's 6.32%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-6.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.61%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.