205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.14%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.66%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.15%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.15%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.87%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.82%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 6.10%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.33%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 0.55%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.82%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 10001.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
68.24%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.17%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
830.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 464.25%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
110.16%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 117.02%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
77.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 85.53%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
45.91%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to AMD's 47.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.73%
Below 50% of AMD's 990.52%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
147.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 175.98%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
1724.99%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 275.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2101.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1336.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
224.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 82.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 121.03%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
53.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 74.79%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
47.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 47.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-16.51%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-22.60%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
16.65%
AR growth well above AMD's 8.05%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.20%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 6.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.28%
Similar asset growth to AMD's 7.37%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
7.82%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.24%
Debt growth far above AMD's 0.23%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.94%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 9.22%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
17.41%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 0.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.