PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.33%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of AMD's 0.39%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
-1.92%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 58.26%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-542.50%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 23.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-231.58%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 23.49%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-293.42%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-274.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-274.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.10%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 0.60%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-2.51%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.32%
Dividend growth of 2.32% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.27%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-52.53%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 21.69%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
11.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 5.13%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
3.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12095.78%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-44.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-937.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is at 65.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1.99%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-193.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 100.82%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
66.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 8.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
108.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.73% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-69.20%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
33.29%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
10.02%
AR growth well above AMD's 11.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-13.16%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.42%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 7.34%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-3.93%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
44.26%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 101.25%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
90.64%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 13.89%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.24%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 8.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.