PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
91.94%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 11.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
122.82%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 42.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
188.14%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 106.53%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
188.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 106.53%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
560.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 160.97%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
589.13%
EPS growth of 589.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth of 589.13% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.32%
Share change of 0.32% while AMD is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
3.74%
Diluted share change of 3.74% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-0.32%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-54.39%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-88.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
43.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 77.94%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
-15.35%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.62%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2204.86%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-32.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
39.09%
Below 50% of AMD's 315.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
104.35%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-7.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with AMD's 45.33%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
63.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
101.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 101.36% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-22.01%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
80.04%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-5.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 28.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.04%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 8.93%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.71%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.55%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 7.05%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.