PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.88%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.46%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 9.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-155.87%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 22.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-155.87%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 22.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-116.65%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 61.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-116.07%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-116.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.87%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.32%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5.33%
Dividend growth of 5.33% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-13.35%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 737.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.08%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 85.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
27.65%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to AMD's 28.97%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
12.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.75%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-17.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 37.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
4.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-398.64%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-439.94%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-244.17%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
176.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 69.87%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
178.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 27.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
85.07%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
93.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.86% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
30.11%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
40.58%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while AMD cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-3.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 6.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.11%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 3.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.15%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.23%
We have a declining book value while AMD shows 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-16.54%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.83%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
169.45%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.88%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 1.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.