205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.12%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 46.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
16.17%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 105.86%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
10.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 178.29%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.17%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 172.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
13.43%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 161.69%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
8.33%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
8.70%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.53%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 2.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.38%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 16.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.49%
Dividend growth of 0.49% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
83.58%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 650.51%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
152.78%
FCF growth 75-90% of AMD's 202.55%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
12.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 68.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-16.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 18.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
101.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 89.63%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
153.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 210.04%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
94.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 31.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
34.58%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 120.92%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
882.41%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 171.85% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
108.68%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 6.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1537.14%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 397.98%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
188.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 42.40%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
162.02%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
99.34%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
10.49%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
27.18%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-6.24%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-5.96%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 12.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.73%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.87%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 4.76%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.93%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.92%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.91%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.71%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
28.49%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 22.69%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.