205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.97%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 7.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 14.72%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
16.31%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 38.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.45%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 38.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
207.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.40%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
204.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.35%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.17%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
4.94%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 2.44%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
5.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above AMD's 2.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-7.43%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
59.20%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
136.40%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 140.45%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-23.23%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 29.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-0.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while AMD stands at 88.40%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
277.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 996.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
42.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 0.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-5.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 325.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
8874.99%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 2030.85% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
307.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 56.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
365.54%
Below 50% of AMD's 1888.83%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
292.02%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 92.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
211.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
153.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 11.85%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
7.92%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
29.26%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-7.85%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
9.79%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 30.59%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
8.75%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 24.69%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
11.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 7.01%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.81%
Similar to AMD's 8.49%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-1.82%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.25%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
3.09%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 5.35%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.