PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 4.10%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
12.09%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 21.21%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
128.36%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.46%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
128.36%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 78.73%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
119.86%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 82.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
119.44%
EPS growth of 119.44% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth of 119.44% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
2.54%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.70%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.54%
Diluted share change of 2.54% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 19.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-6.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while AMD stands at 9.14%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.62%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
506.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-52.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
892.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 12.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
67.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.45%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
46.91%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
4.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.65% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
3.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.16%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.65%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 1.72%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-20.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.97%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.51%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.