PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
10.72%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 9.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
8.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 62.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 33.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-28.46%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.55%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.35%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.69%
Dividend growth of 53.69% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-63.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-101.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
0.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 32.02%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
32.83%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 62.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
18.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-19.88%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
67.07%
Below 50% of AMD's 683.33%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
237.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 25.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
130.60%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
32.77%
Below 50% of AMD's 129.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
62.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
309.80%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
66.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 8.63%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-5.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
83.26%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
3.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 3.43% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.09% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.64%
AR growth well above AMD's 9.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
16.67%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.77%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
52.33%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.35%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.36%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.27%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.94%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 10.69%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.