PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.15%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-20.25%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.69%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 41.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.24%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.33%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.36%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.95%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-59.92%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-77.51%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-9.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD stands at 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
3.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
81.70%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 17.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
96.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
24.83%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 3.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
56.05%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-6.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1308.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
217.61%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 2.48%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
12.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
63.26%
Stable or rising dividend while AMD is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
17.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 17.88% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.81% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.64%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.43%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.14%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.97%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.