PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-11.23%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-21.74%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.91%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.77%
Share reduction while AMD is at 2.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.00%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
1.80%
Dividend growth of 1.80% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-34.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-40.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
49.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.42%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
130.13%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
101.41%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
146.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
69.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
323.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1889.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
68.97%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
181.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 36.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
25.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.20%
Below 50% of AMD's 35.93%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
91.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 91.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
106.54%
Dividend/share CAGR of 106.54% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
88.39%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 88.39% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-1.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.95%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 15.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.29%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.11%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 12.27%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.93%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 16.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.