205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Negative revenue growth while AMD stands at 8.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.87%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 17.34%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-1.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-2.71%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.18%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.45%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 9.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.02%
Dividend growth of 25.02% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-9.93%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
66.42%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 39.55%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
96.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 52.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.72%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
241.13%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
127.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to AMD's 136.81%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
37.02%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
401.02%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
252.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
91.65%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.40%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.05%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
361.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.20% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
355.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 355.42% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
294.10%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 294.10% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.89%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.21%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.70%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.09%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.