PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.99%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.87%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.98%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 86.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-18.98%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 84.27%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-12.32%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 79.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.09%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.28%
Share reduction while AMD is at 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.79%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.35%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-54.95%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-66.02%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
75.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 30.87%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
88.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 19.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1774.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 134.87%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
311.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 111.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
57.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
6975.22%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
612.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
106.47%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
93.88%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.72%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
6.14%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
373.82%
Dividend/share CAGR of 373.82% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
352.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 352.76% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
296.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 296.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.19%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
11.28%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.60%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.17%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.98%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 5.92%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.08%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 6.23%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.