PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.07%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 31.65%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-6.06%
Negative gross profit growth while AMD is at 30.03%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.44%
Negative EBIT growth while AMD is at 119.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.44%
Negative operating income growth while AMD is at 191.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-4.25%
Negative net income growth while AMD stands at 88.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-4.44%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 88.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 88.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.21%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.72%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.46%
Dividend growth of 0.46% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
102.70%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 10.74%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
243.37%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 14.37%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
91.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 21.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
76.29%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 6.38%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
123.71%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
171.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-13.46%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
311.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
66.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
11.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
100.48%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
16.45%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
5.88%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
361.29%
Dividend/share CAGR of 361.29% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
366.79%
Dividend/share CAGR of 366.79% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
652488.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 652488.96% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 41.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.60%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.68%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.34%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-8.88%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.