PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.66%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.29%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
8.23%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.57%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.46%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.72%
Share reduction while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.11%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.73%
Dividend growth of 0.73% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-29.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-13.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
48.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
133.79%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
87.28%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
49.88%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
106.89%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
120.86%
Below 50% of AMD's 920.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.13%
Below 50% of AMD's 132.66%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
15.89%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
13.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.63%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
463.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 463.52% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
378.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 378.03% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
200.44%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 200.44% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
19.50%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.16%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 1.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.07%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.59%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.52%
We increase R&D while AMD cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.16%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 121.83%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.