PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.10%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
3.79%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.77%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.07%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.54%
Negative EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-15.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while AMD is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.62%
Share count expansion well above AMD's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.04%
Diluted share change of 1.04% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.42%
Dividend growth of 0.42% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-53.76%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.70%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
183.96%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
23.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
66.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 14.85%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
152.15%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2.25%
Below 50% of AMD's 95.20%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
99.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 123.34%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
1259.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-35.21%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while AMD is 27.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
1638.85%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
55.33%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.79%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
34.09%
Below 50% of AMD's 650.44%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
776.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 776.07% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
324.16%
Dividend/share CAGR of 324.16% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.27%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.27% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.34%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
3.64%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 22.90%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.38%
Negative asset growth while AMD invests at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.47%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.49%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 2.79%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.05%
We expand SG&A while AMD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.