PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.28%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 27.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
13.83%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 25.08%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
24.58%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.89%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 413.33%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
18.19%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.46%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
24.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.22%
Dividend growth of 0.22% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
32.18%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 134.12%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
39.85%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 118.87%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
46.99%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
21.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.02%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
407.30%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
41.89%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
34.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to AMD's 36.05%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
107.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
84.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
68.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
28.66%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
6.60%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
1.90%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1149.23%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1149.23% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
194.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 194.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.78% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.34%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.62%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.33%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 9.05%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.48%
Under 50% of AMD's 199.02%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.52%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 6.58%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.64%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.