PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.45%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 37.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
11.88%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 47.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
20.05%
EBIT growth below 50% of AMD's 3000.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
20.81%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 12000.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
21.69%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 245.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
22.86%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 450.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
22.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 450.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.60%
Share reduction while AMD is at 7.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.69%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 10.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.00%
Dividend growth of 0.00% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
87.79%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 180.49%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
100.52%
FCF growth 50-75% of AMD's 134.04%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
61.16%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
38.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
61.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
63.85%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 120.15%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
33.59%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 206.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
137.49%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 108.39%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
87.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 128.47%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
66.91%
Below 50% of AMD's 200.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
41.50%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
10.21%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
522.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 522.75% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
191.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 191.83% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.48% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
7.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. AMD's 25.57%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-2.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.99%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 6.41%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.24%
Under 50% of AMD's 15.91%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Our R&D shrinks while AMD invests at 12.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.07%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.